Lawyers Ong Johnson and Lo Khai Yi dissect this new regulatory landscape. We explore whether ONSA is a necessary shield against digital harm or a potential "political tool" for censorship, and what the RM10 million penalty cap means for tech giants operating in Malaysia.

We discuss:

The "Grok" Precedent: How the recent AI chatbot controversy served as the first real test case for MCMC's new powers under ONSA.
Who is Targeted? A breakdown of the three key entities regulated by the act: ASPs (Social Media like X/Facebook), CASPs (Content providers like Netflix/Infotainment), and NSPs (Telcos).
The "Teeth" of the Law: Analysing the severe penalties, up to RM10 million for serious non-compliance, and whether this is enough to compel Big Tech to change their platform design.
Reporting Mechanisms: The two distinct routes users now have to report harmful content (Direct to Platform vs. Direct to MCMC).
The "Proactive" Shift: Why companies must move from reacting to reports to proactively moderating content before the MCMC’s upcoming Code of Practice makes it mandatory.

bf:["technology","government"] c0:["onsa 2025","cyber law","tech policy","online safety act","regulation","freedom of speech"] c1:["Ong Johnson","Lo Khai Yi"] c2:["none","none"] c3:["Partner & Co-Head of Technology Practice Group","Partner & Co Head of Technology Practice Group"] c4:["Halim Hong & Quek","Halim Hong & Quek"] c5:["Ong Johnson, Partner & Co-Head of Technology Practice Group, Halim Hong & Quek","Lo Khai Yi, Partner & Co Head of Technology Practice Group, Halim Hong & Quek"] bd:{"omny_id":"940a66a1-d848-4e2c-a23e-b3d7005fbe23","omny_embed":"https://omny.fm/shows/enterprise-biz-bytes/grok-bikinis-and-malaysias-online-safety-act-2025/embed","omny_mp3":"https://traf